Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Alabama
Crimson Tide
vs
Big Ten
Wisconsin
Badgers
On the field
Alabama won 3814 on Sep 13.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BAMA sentiment · 141,238 comments
Positive54.8%
Neutral7%
Negative36.5%
Mixed1.6%
WIS sentiment · 48,811 comments
Positive28.2%
Neutral11%
Negative59.1%
Mixed1.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Alabama
Wisconsin

Fan Score

548.3 (better)
281.5

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.8% (better)
28.2%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Alabama
Wisconsin

Negativity

365.5 (better)
591

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

33.2 (better)
54.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

16 (better)
40.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Alabama left, Wisconsin right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Alabama
Wisconsin

Betting talk

3
13.6

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

114
222.7

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.2
19.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Alabama up, Wisconsin down
Alabama positive ↑Wisconsin positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BAMA 38WIS 14
Alabama had the happier comment section in 18 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin in 4. When they met on Sep 13, Alabama won 38–14; Alabama’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Alabama and Wisconsin
Week ofAlabama resultAlabama positive shareAlabama negative shareWisconsin resultWisconsin positive shareWisconsin negative share
2025-08-2380.3%12.6%W34.3%52.1%
2025-08-30L26%65.2%38.3%50.1%
2025-09-06W38.5%51.3%W32.4%56.2%
2025-09-13W69%21%L19.2%67.5%
2025-09-2074.3%14.3%L13.7%77.1%
2025-09-27W74.3%16.8%17.6%70.2%
2025-10-04W80.3%13.5%L24.1%61.9%
2025-10-11W66.8%25.5%L16.5%71.6%
2025-10-18W80%12.5%L19.1%67.6%
2025-10-25W61%28.4%L27.2%58%
2025-11-0171.3%14.6%22.7%60.6%
2025-11-08W74.4%18.5%W55.2%34%
2025-11-15L39.9%50.8%L36.8%48.9%
2025-11-22W66.1%26.5%W59.7%29.3%
2025-11-29W65.1%27.3%L25.6%56%
2025-12-06L39.7%51.1%52.3%38.2%
2025-12-13W74.7%18.5%60.4%22.9%
2025-12-2062.6%30.1%40.4%44.2%
2025-12-27L37.6%54.3%57.8%29.9%
2026-01-0351.4%34.4%41.5%42.9%
2026-01-1074.4%18.2%49%36.2%
2026-01-1741.2%39.4%50%42.9%
Reactions from that night · Sep 13
Alabama

Yall go out there play your asses off 4 quarter football.

positiveExplicit WordsFacebook

Dnt forget Florida State made the boys quit two weeks ago

negativeOpponent HostilityFacebook
Wisconsin

All but Russell recruited and groomed by Chryst and staff! And 10 starters on the current team, including Hallman, Preston, Anthony, Brunner, Barten, Peterson - all Chryst recruits, 3 full years into this current regime!

negativeRecruitingFacebook

To get their asses handed to them

negativeExplicit WordsFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AlabamaWisconsin
Harm · WIS +36 ptsIdentity-Based Abuse · WIS +10 ptsExplicit Language · WIS +45 ptsCollege Sports · WIS +91 ptsOff-Field Storylines · WIS +20 ptsSports Betting · WIS +51 ptsTeam & Front Office · WIS +60 pts
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Alabama Harm: 51st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Identity-Based Abuse: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Explicit Language: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Off-Field Storylines: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Sports Betting: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Team & Front Office: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Harm: 87th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Identity-Based Abuse: 56th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Explicit Language: 88th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin College Sports: 95th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Off-Field Storylines: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Sports Betting: 100th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Wisconsin Team & Front Office: 96th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Alabama's positive share was higher in 18 of 22 shared weeks, Wisconsin's in 4.

BAMAWIS
0%40%80%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BAMA, WIS
Week ofBAMAWISComments
2025-08-2380.3%34.3%3,702
2025-08-3026%38.3%13,007
2025-09-0638.5%32.4%13,825
2025-09-1369%19.2%7,655
2025-09-2074.3%13.7%7,056
2025-09-2774.3%17.6%7,978
2025-10-0480.3%24.1%9,834
2025-10-1166.8%16.5%12,146
2025-10-1880%19.1%9,923
2025-10-2561%27.2%8,809
2025-11-0171.3%22.7%3,632
2025-11-0874.4%55.2%11,630
2025-11-1539.9%36.8%10,761
2025-11-2266.1%59.7%8,358
2025-11-2965.1%25.6%12,698
2025-12-0639.7%52.3%16,238
2025-12-1374.7%60.4%3,753
2025-12-2062.6%40.4%10,498
2025-12-2737.6%57.8%14,651
2026-01-0351.4%41.5%2,440
2026-01-1074.4%49%536
2026-01-1741.2%50%919
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.