Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Alabama
Crimson Tide
vs
Sun Belt
UL Monroe
Warhawks
On the field
Alabama won 730 on Sep 6.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
BAMA sentiment · 141,238 comments
Positive54.8%
Neutral7%
Negative36.5%
Mixed1.6%
ULM sentiment · 943 comments
Positive74.1%
Neutral11.8%
Negative12.3%
Mixed1.8%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Alabama
UL Monroe

Fan Score

548.3
(better)741.3

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.8%
(better)74.1%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Alabama
UL Monroe

Negativity

365.5
(better)123

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

33.2
(better)11.7

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

16
(better)5.3

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Alabama left, UL Monroe right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Alabama
UL Monroe

Betting talk

3
0

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

114
83.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.2
6.4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Alabama up, UL Monroe down
Alabama positive ↑UL Monroe positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
BAMA 73ULM 0
Alabama had the happier comment section in 7 of 22 shared weeks, UL Monroe in 15. When they met on Sep 6, Alabama won 73–0; UL Monroe’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Alabama and UL Monroe
Week ofAlabama resultAlabama positive shareAlabama negative shareUL Monroe resultUL Monroe positive shareUL Monroe negative share
2025-08-2380.3%12.6%W76.8%4.2%
2025-08-30L26%65.2%78.5%6.3%
2025-09-06W38.5%51.3%L84%8%
2025-09-13W69%21%81.8%9.1%
2025-09-2074.3%14.3%W82.4%4.5%
2025-09-27W74.3%16.8%W88.4%5.4%
2025-10-04W80.3%13.5%L80.4%15.2%
2025-10-11W66.8%25.5%L47.6%11.9%
2025-10-18W80%12.5%L48%24%
2025-10-25W61%28.4%L70.8%16.7%
2025-11-0171.3%14.6%L47.5%35.6%
2025-11-08W74.4%18.5%66.7%0%
2025-11-15L39.9%50.8%L30.8%57.7%
2025-11-22W66.1%26.5%L48.9%37.8%
2025-11-29W65.1%27.3%L61.9%16.7%
2025-12-06L39.7%51.1%100%0%
2025-12-13W74.7%18.5%100%0%
2025-12-2062.6%30.1%100%0%
2025-12-27L37.6%54.3%100%0%
2026-01-0351.4%34.4%83.3%16.7%
2026-01-1074.4%18.2%80%0%
2026-01-1741.2%39.4%0%100%
Reactions from that night · Sep 6
Alabama

Y’all need Butch Jones back asap!

positiveCoachingFacebook

If we don’t beat em by 50 they better give Deboer his buyout and send him and his shitty west coast coaching staff back to Seattle!! 🤬🤬🤣🤣

negativeExplicit WordsCoachingFacebook
UL Monroe

I’ll be there cheering you on with my BAMA husband

positiveFacebook

GEAUX WARHAWKS! https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BFsiTV5Mw/?mibextid=wwXIfr

positiveFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AlabamaUL Monroe
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Alabama Harm: 51st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Identity-Based Abuse: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Explicit Language: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Off-Field Storylines: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Sports Betting: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Team & Front Office: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • UL Monroe Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • UL Monroe Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Alabama's positive share was higher in 9 of 22 shared weeks, UL Monroe's in 13.

BAMAULM
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BAMA, ULM
Week ofBAMAULMComments
2025-08-2380.3%76.8%1,390
2025-08-3026%78.5%12,345
2025-09-0638.5%84%11,467
2025-09-1369%81.8%3,580
2025-09-2074.3%82.4%2,146
2025-09-2774.3%88.4%6,938
2025-10-0480.3%80.4%7,185
2025-10-1166.8%47.6%4,910
2025-10-1880%48%4,834
2025-10-2561%70.8%6,225
2025-11-0171.3%47.5%2,428
2025-11-0874.4%66.7%7,191
2025-11-1539.9%30.8%8,436
2025-11-2266.1%48.9%6,394
2025-11-2965.1%61.9%10,107
2025-12-0639.7%100%15,938
2025-12-1374.7%100%3,715
2025-12-2062.6%100%10,404
2025-12-2737.6%100%14,514
2026-01-0351.4%83.3%1,137
2026-01-1074.4%80%345
2026-01-1741.2%0%552
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.