Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

SEC
Alabama
Crimson Tide
vs
MAC
Kent State
Golden Flashes
BAMA sentiment · 141,238 comments
Positive54.8%
Neutral7%
Negative36.5%
Mixed1.6%
KENT sentiment · 708 comments
Positive70.9%
Neutral16.7%
Negative11.2%
Mixed1.3%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Alabama
Kent State

Fan Score

548.3
(better)709

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

54.8%
(better)70.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Alabama
Kent State

Negativity

365.5
(better)111.6

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

33.2
(better)2.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

16
(better)4.2

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Alabama left, Kent State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Alabama
Kent State

Betting talk

3
4.2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

114
98.9

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

4.2
1.4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Alabama up, Kent State down
Alabama positive ↑Kent State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Alabama had the happier comment section in 8 of 21 shared weeks, Kent State in 13.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Alabama and Kent State
Week ofAlabama resultAlabama positive shareAlabama negative shareKent State resultKent State positive shareKent State negative share
2025-08-2380.3%12.6%40.5%11.9%
2025-08-30L26%65.2%W67.9%11.3%
2025-09-06W38.5%51.3%L94.5%3.3%
2025-09-13W69%21%L63.3%13.3%
2025-09-2074.3%14.3%L0%0%
2025-09-27W74.3%16.8%65.5%10.9%
2025-10-04W80.3%13.5%L35%50%
2025-10-11W66.8%25.5%W54.5%9.1%
2025-10-18W80%12.5%L66.7%0%
2025-10-25W61%28.4%W91.9%5%
2025-11-0171.3%14.6%L71.4%11.4%
2025-11-08W74.4%18.5%W68.8%0%
2025-11-15L39.9%50.8%L55.2%13.8%
2025-11-22W66.1%26.5%W81.3%0%
2025-11-29W65.1%27.3%37.5%12.5%
2025-12-06L39.7%51.1%85.7%0%
2025-12-13W74.7%18.5%59.5%7.1%
2025-12-2062.6%30.1%90%0%
2025-12-27L37.6%54.3%80%0%
2026-01-0351.4%34.4%
2026-01-1074.4%18.2%34.2%47.4%
2026-01-1741.2%39.4%61.5%38.5%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AlabamaKent State
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Alabama Harm: 51st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Identity-Based Abuse: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Explicit Language: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Off-Field Storylines: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Sports Betting: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Alabama Team & Front Office: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Kent State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Alabama's positive share was higher in 11 of 21 shared weeks, Kent State's in 10.

BAMAKENT
0%47%95%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: BAMA, KENT
Week ofBAMAKENTComments
2025-08-2380.3%40.5%1,337
2025-08-3026%67.9%12,319
2025-09-0638.5%94.5%11,483
2025-09-1369%63.3%3,599
2025-09-2074.3%0%1,971
2025-09-2774.3%65.5%6,846
2025-10-0480.3%35%7,159
2025-10-1166.8%54.5%4,879
2025-10-1880%66.7%4,827
2025-10-2561%91.9%6,361
2025-11-0171.3%71.4%2,404
2025-11-0874.4%68.8%7,204
2025-11-1539.9%55.2%8,439
2025-11-2266.1%81.3%6,365
2025-11-2965.1%37.5%10,081
2025-12-0639.7%85.7%15,939
2025-12-1374.7%59.5%3,747
2025-12-2062.6%90%10,404
2025-12-2737.6%80%14,509
2026-01-0351.4%0%1,131
2026-01-1074.4%34.2%378
2026-01-1741.2%61.5%564
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.