Whose comment section wins?
Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.
Who is happier
Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.
Fan Score
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)
Positive share
Share of all comments that are positive
Share of all comments that are positive
Who is harsher
Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.
Negativity
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Toxicity
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit language
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)
Identity-based abuse, tag by tag
Tag applications per 1,000 comments
Alabama left, Indiana right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.
What they talk about
Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.
Betting talk
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Sports-betting comments per 1,000
Team & front office talk
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday
NIL & portal talk
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap
Week by week, side by side
The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.
Rivalry pulse
| Week of | Alabama result | Alabama positive share | Alabama negative share | Indiana result | Indiana positive share | Indiana negative share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | – | 80.3% | 12.6% | – | 73.6% | 14.2% |
| 2025-08-30 | L | 26% | 65.2% | W | 49.9% | 33.6% |
| 2025-09-06 | W | 38.5% | 51.3% | W W | 56.3% | 29.6% |
| 2025-09-13 | W | 69% | 21% | – | 51.2% | 33.2% |
| 2025-09-20 | – | 74.3% | 14.3% | W | 70.5% | 18.3% |
| 2025-09-27 | W | 74.3% | 16.8% | W | 62.9% | 24.6% |
| 2025-10-04 | W | 80.3% | 13.5% | – | 59% | 24.6% |
| 2025-10-11 | W | 66.8% | 25.5% | W | 77.5% | 13.1% |
| 2025-10-18 | W | 80% | 12.5% | W | 67.7% | 17.8% |
| 2025-10-25 | W | 61% | 28.4% | W | 78.1% | 12.7% |
| 2025-11-01 | – | 71.3% | 14.6% | W | 72.7% | 17.5% |
| 2025-11-08 | W | 74.4% | 18.5% | W | 68% | 23.8% |
| 2025-11-15 | L | 39.9% | 50.8% | W | 75.2% | 15.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | W | 66.1% | 26.5% | W | 81.4% | 9.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | W | 65.1% | 27.3% | – | 64.4% | 24.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | L | 39.7% | 51.1% | W | 75.1% | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | W | 74.7% | 18.5% | – | 79.8% | 12.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | – | 62.6% | 30.1% | – | 72% | 20.7% |
| 2025-12-27 | L | 37.6% | 54.3% | W | 81.6% | 11.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | – | 51.4% | 34.4% | W | 80.9% | 8% |
| 2026-01-10 | – | 74.4% | 18.2% | – | 75.9% | 11.2% |
| 2026-01-17 | – | 41.2% | 39.4% | W | 79.2% | 10.2% |
“ROLL TIDE!!! Praying all the players are healthy! Congratulations for making it this far!! 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹”
“The absolute worst venue to watch a college football game”
“I don't care what team you normally root for, you gotta love Curt and what he's done at Indiana”
“One and down I will keep betting on what Coach Sabin is saying he thinks he knows who the two Final teams will be and Indiana is not one of them”
Fingerprint duel
Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.
- Alabama Harm: 51st percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Alabama Identity-Based Abuse: 46th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Alabama Explicit Language: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Alabama College Sports: 4th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Alabama Off-Field Storylines: 23rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Alabama Sports Betting: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Alabama Team & Front Office: 36th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana Harm: 37th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana Identity-Based Abuse: 6th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana Explicit Language: 11th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana College Sports: 3rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana Off-Field Storylines: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana Sports Betting: 54th percentile of ranked FBS teams
- Indiana Team & Front Office: 32nd percentile of ranked FBS teams
The season, felt twice
Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Alabama's positive share was higher in 8 of 22 shared weeks, Indiana's in 14.
| Week of | BAMA | IU | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-23 | 80.3% | 73.6% | 1,697 |
| 2025-08-30 | 26% | 49.9% | 12,853 |
| 2025-09-06 | 38.5% | 56.3% | 12,055 |
| 2025-09-13 | 69% | 51.2% | 4,051 |
| 2025-09-20 | 74.3% | 70.5% | 3,289 |
| 2025-09-27 | 74.3% | 62.9% | 8,386 |
| 2025-10-04 | 80.3% | 59% | 7,703 |
| 2025-10-11 | 66.8% | 77.5% | 8,227 |
| 2025-10-18 | 80% | 67.7% | 6,390 |
| 2025-10-25 | 61% | 78.1% | 7,198 |
| 2025-11-01 | 71.3% | 72.7% | 3,690 |
| 2025-11-08 | 74.4% | 68% | 9,936 |
| 2025-11-15 | 39.9% | 75.2% | 9,545 |
| 2025-11-22 | 66.1% | 81.4% | 7,301 |
| 2025-11-29 | 65.1% | 64.4% | 12,803 |
| 2025-12-06 | 39.7% | 75.1% | 20,495 |
| 2025-12-13 | 74.7% | 79.8% | 5,409 |
| 2025-12-20 | 62.6% | 72% | 10,741 |
| 2025-12-27 | 37.6% | 81.6% | 18,332 |
| 2026-01-03 | 51.4% | 80.9% | 2,723 |
| 2026-01-10 | 74.4% | 75.9% | 3,078 |
| 2026-01-17 | 41.2% | 79.2% | 7,537 |