Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Akron
Zips
vs
Big Ten
Nebraska
Cornhuskers
On the field
Nebraska won 680 on Sep 6.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
AKR sentiment · 1,038 comments
Positive62.2%
Neutral10.2%
Negative27.1%
Mixed0.5%
NEB sentiment · 47,727 comments
Positive46.6%
Neutral8.9%
Negative42.5%
Mixed2%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Akron
Nebraska

Fan Score

622.4 (better)
466

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

62.2% (better)
46.6%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Akron
Nebraska

Negativity

270.7 (better)
425.4

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

13.5 (better)
57.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

7.7 (better)
41.5

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Akron left, Nebraska right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Akron
Nebraska

Betting talk

1.9
3.7

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

79
135

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

12.5
10.5

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Akron up, Nebraska down
Akron positive ↑Nebraska positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
AKR 0NEB 68
Akron had the happier comment section in 15 of 22 shared weeks, Nebraska in 7. When they met on Sep 6, Nebraska won 68–0; Nebraska’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Akron and Nebraska
Week ofAkron resultAkron positive shareAkron negative shareNebraska resultNebraska positive shareNebraska negative share
2025-08-23L23.6%62.3%W51.4%35.5%
2025-08-3048.1%40.7%64.1%23.3%
2025-09-06L32.2%54.8%W56%30%
2025-09-13L63.6%33.3%W62.3%25.6%
2025-09-20W79.5%8.9%L34.1%56.3%
2025-09-27L34.8%58%73.9%17.6%
2025-10-04W76.7%8.9%W55.5%34.5%
2025-10-11L66.7%33.3%W L64.6%24.8%
2025-10-18L68.8%9.4%19.4%71.3%
2025-10-25W82.9%6.1%W49.6%39.6%
2025-11-01W84.9%9.6%L31.3%57.6%
2025-11-08L53%34.9%W65.3%24.6%
2025-11-15W83.7%14%66.1%18.7%
2025-11-22100%0%L L28.6%62%
2025-11-2993.9%0%59.3%32.9%
2025-12-06100%0%41.5%46.7%
2025-12-13100%0%48.5%37.1%
2025-12-20100%0%74.6%18.6%
2025-12-2766.7%16.7%L30.2%58.9%
2026-01-0366.7%16.7%53.9%30.9%
2026-01-1066.7%6.7%63.5%24.2%
2026-01-1766.7%11.1%68%24.8%
Reactions from that night · Sep 6
Akron

it's GAMEDAY will be broadcast live on here https://www.wonyy.sport-affclub.com/hsfootball.php

positiveBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Game will be broadcast live on here :⤵️ 🎥 https://www.selection.king-cpasports.com/hsfootball.php

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook
Nebraska

I love them just vibing out.

positiveBandFacebook

Nebraska football 🏈 head coach third season Matt Rhule showing what this place is all about 💯 go big red

positiveCoachingFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AkronNebraska
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Akron Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Nebraska Harm: 85th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Identity-Based Abuse: 89th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Explicit Language: 90th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska College Sports: 68th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Off-Field Storylines: 41st percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Sports Betting: 67th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Nebraska Team & Front Office: 63rd percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Akron's positive share was higher in 16 of 22 shared weeks, Nebraska's in 6.

AKRNEB
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: AKR, NEB
Week ofAKRNEBComments
2025-08-2323.6%51.4%4,090
2025-08-3048.1%64.1%948
2025-09-0632.2%56%3,155
2025-09-1363.6%62.3%2,254
2025-09-2079.5%34.1%3,210
2025-09-2734.8%73.9%422
2025-10-0476.7%55.5%2,370
2025-10-1166.7%64.6%3,923
2025-10-1868.8%19.4%3,609
2025-10-2582.9%49.6%2,988
2025-11-0184.9%31.3%3,289
2025-11-0853%65.3%3,929
2025-11-1583.7%66.1%637
2025-11-22100%28.6%4,858
2025-11-2993.9%59.3%1,582
2025-12-06100%41.5%783
2025-12-13100%48.5%377
2025-12-20100%74.6%315
2025-12-2766.7%30.2%4,202
2026-01-0366.7%53.9%584
2026-01-1066.7%63.5%762
2026-01-1766.7%68%478
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.