Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Akron
Zips
vs
SEC
Mississippi State
Bulldogs
AKR sentiment · 1,038 comments
Positive62.2%
Neutral10.2%
Negative27.1%
Mixed0.5%
MSST sentiment · 32,592 comments
Positive56.3%
Neutral8.6%
Negative33.6%
Mixed1.6%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Akron
Mississippi State

Fan Score

622.4 (better)
562.6

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

62.2% (better)
56.3%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Akron
Mississippi State

Negativity

270.7 (better)
336.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

13.5 (better)
40.3

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

7.7 (better)
25.8

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Akron left, Mississippi State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Akron
Mississippi State

Betting talk

1.9
2.4

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

79
165

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

12.5
7.1

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Akron up, Mississippi State down
Akron positive ↑Mississippi State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
Akron had the happier comment section in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Mississippi State in 9.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Akron and Mississippi State
Week ofAkron resultAkron positive shareAkron negative shareMississippi State resultMississippi State positive shareMississippi State negative share
2025-08-23L23.6%62.3%76%17.1%
2025-08-3048.1%40.7%W66.3%23.4%
2025-09-06L32.2%54.8%W70.8%18.8%
2025-09-13L63.6%33.3%W64.1%19.1%
2025-09-20W79.5%8.9%W72.6%15.2%
2025-09-27L34.8%58%L65.5%24.9%
2025-10-04W76.7%8.9%L52.2%39.1%
2025-10-11L66.7%33.3%80.1%10%
2025-10-18L68.8%9.4%L26.2%65.6%
2025-10-25W82.9%6.1%L22.5%69.5%
2025-11-01W84.9%9.6%W64.4%26.2%
2025-11-08L53%34.9%L50.1%40.2%
2025-11-15W83.7%14%L32.6%60.9%
2025-11-22100%0%L52.8%31.9%
2025-11-2993.9%0%70.3%21.5%
2025-12-06100%0%67.3%18.6%
2025-12-13100%0%83.6%11.7%
2025-12-20100%0%90.2%4.3%
2025-12-2766.7%16.7%L72.5%15.8%
2026-01-0366.7%16.7%43.4%47.4%
2026-01-1066.7%6.7%77.4%10.9%
2026-01-1766.7%11.1%84.4%11.1%

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AkronMississippi State
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Akron Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Mississippi State Harm: 69th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Mississippi State Identity-Based Abuse: 43rd percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Mississippi State Explicit Language: 58th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Mississippi State College Sports: 26th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Mississippi State Off-Field Storylines: 49th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Mississippi State Sports Betting: 25th percentile of ranked FBS teams
  • Mississippi State Team & Front Office: 76th percentile of ranked FBS teams

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Akron's positive share was higher in 13 of 22 shared weeks, Mississippi State's in 9.

AKRMSST
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: AKR, MSST
Week ofAKRMSSTComments
2025-08-2323.6%76%510
2025-08-3048.1%66.3%1,801
2025-09-0632.2%70.8%3,813
2025-09-1363.6%64.1%1,670
2025-09-2079.5%72.6%1,965
2025-09-2734.8%65.5%2,399
2025-10-0476.7%52.2%1,790
2025-10-1166.7%80.1%645
2025-10-1868.8%26.2%2,640
2025-10-2582.9%22.5%2,666
2025-11-0184.9%64.4%2,911
2025-11-0853%50.1%1,682
2025-11-1583.7%32.6%1,759
2025-11-22100%52.8%1,419
2025-11-2993.9%70.3%969
2025-12-06100%67.3%1,548
2025-12-13100%83.6%276
2025-12-20100%90.2%167
2025-12-2766.7%72.5%880
2026-01-0366.7%43.4%1,713
2026-01-1066.7%77.4%254
2026-01-1766.7%84.4%153
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.