Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Akron
Zips
vs
MAC
Miami (Ohio)
RedHawks
On the field
Miami (Ohio) won 207 on Oct 11.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
AKR sentiment · 1,038 comments
Positive62.2%
Neutral10.2%
Negative27.1%
Mixed0.5%
M-OH sentiment · 1,085 comments
Positive79%
Neutral8.7%
Negative11.6%
Mixed0.7%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Akron
Miami (Ohio)

Fan Score

622.4
(better)789.9

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

62.2%
(better)79%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Akron
Miami (Ohio)

Negativity

270.7
(better)116.1

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

13.5 (better)
13.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

7.7
(better)1.8

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Akron left, Miami (Ohio) right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Akron
Miami (Ohio)

Betting talk

1.9
0.9

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

79
49.8

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

12.5
3.7

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Akron up, Miami (Ohio) down
Akron positive ↑Miami (Ohio) positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
AKR 7M-OH 20
Akron had the happier comment section in 8 of 21 shared weeks, Miami (Ohio) in 13. When they met on Oct 11, Miami (Ohio) won 20–7; Miami (Ohio)’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Akron and Miami (Ohio)
Week ofAkron resultAkron positive shareAkron negative shareMiami (Ohio) resultMiami (Ohio) positive shareMiami (Ohio) negative share
2025-08-23L23.6%62.3%L85.3%5.9%
2025-08-3048.1%40.7%57.1%33.3%
2025-09-06L32.2%54.8%L72.4%13.8%
2025-09-13L63.6%33.3%76.9%7.7%
2025-09-20W79.5%8.9%L51.6%29%
2025-09-27L34.8%58%W86.7%3.3%
2025-10-04W76.7%8.9%W94%2.4%
2025-10-11L66.7%33.3%W90.6%1.9%
2025-10-18L68.8%9.4%W81.3%0%
2025-10-25W82.9%6.1%W83.2%4.7%
2025-11-01W84.9%9.6%L63.8%27.6%
2025-11-08L53%34.9%L60.9%19.6%
2025-11-15W83.7%14%W88.6%6.4%
2025-11-22100%0%89.7%7.7%
2025-11-2993.9%0%W83.2%8.8%
2025-12-06100%0%L68.1%25%
2025-12-13100%0%86.7%13.3%
2025-12-20100%0%78.4%5.4%
2025-12-2766.7%16.7%L60.8%27.8%
2026-01-0366.7%16.7%
2026-01-1066.7%6.7%80%0%
2026-01-1766.7%11.1%100%0%
Reactions from that night · Oct 11
Akron

Should be up 10-0. Can’t keep killing yourself in the red zone

negativeViolent LanguageFacebook

We should be up 10-0! Continued stupid mistakes!!

negativeFacebook
Miami (Ohio)

You’ve got this RedHawks!

positiveFacebook

Safe travels and best of luck, RedHawks! ❤️

positiveFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AkronMiami (Ohio)
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Akron Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Miami (Ohio) Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Akron's positive share was higher in 8 of 21 shared weeks, Miami (Ohio)'s in 13.

AKRM-OH
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: AKR, M-OH
Week ofAKRM-OHComments
2025-08-2323.6%85.3%174
2025-08-3048.1%57.1%48
2025-09-0632.2%72.4%144
2025-09-1363.6%76.9%46
2025-09-2079.5%51.6%143
2025-09-2734.8%86.7%99
2025-10-0476.7%94%174
2025-10-1166.7%90.6%80
2025-10-1868.8%81.3%64
2025-10-2582.9%83.2%189
2025-11-0184.9%63.8%131
2025-11-0853%60.9%129
2025-11-1583.7%88.6%226
2025-11-22100%89.7%41
2025-11-2993.9%83.2%158
2025-12-06100%68.1%77
2025-12-13100%86.7%17
2025-12-20100%78.4%41
2025-12-2766.7%60.8%85
2026-01-0366.7%0%18
2026-01-1066.7%80%20
2026-01-1766.7%100%19
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.