Head to head

Whose comment section wins?

Pick any two fanbases and compare what their comment sections say, stat for stat.

MAC
Akron
Zips
vs
MAC
Kent State
Golden Flashes
On the field
Kent State won 4235 (OT) on Nov 11.
The comment sections had their own opinions.
AKR sentiment · 1,038 comments
Positive62.2%
Neutral10.2%
Negative27.1%
Mixed0.5%
KENT sentiment · 708 comments
Positive70.9%
Neutral16.7%
Negative11.2%
Mixed1.3%
Mood

Who is happier

Fan Score counts positive comments per 1,000, so a loud fanbase cannot buy its way up the board. Positive share tells the same story as a percentage of everything said.

Akron
Kent State

Fan Score

622.4
(better)709

Positive comments per 1,000 (higher wins)

Positive share

62.2%
(better)70.9%

Share of all comments that are positive

Edge

Who is harsher

Negativity, toxicity and explicit language, every one of them per 1,000 comments so the two sides stay comparable whatever their volume.

Akron
Kent State

Negativity

270.7
(better)111.6

Negative comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Toxicity

13.5
(better)2.8

Harm and identity-based abuse per 1,000 (lower wins)

Explicit language

7.7
(better)4.2

Explicit-language comments per 1,000 (lower wins)

Identity-based abuse, tag by tag

Tag applications per 1,000 comments

Akron left, Kent State right. Tag applications per 1,000 comments, on the same scale across every row. Reported as rates only: this block never picks a winner.

Subject matter

What they talk about

Three topic groups where neither direction is better, just louder. These rows describe a comment section instead of scoring it.

Akron
Kent State

Betting talk

1.9
4.2

Sports-betting comments per 1,000

Team & front office talk

79
98.9

Team and front-office comments per 1,000: coaching, the athletic department, and gameday

NIL & portal talk

12.5
1.4

NIL and Transfer Portal tag applications per 1,000, which may overlap

Shape of the season

Week by week, side by side

The same season read twice: weekly mood for both comment sections, the weeks the two teams actually met, and where each fanbase lands nationally on the seven topic groups.

Rivalry pulse

Weekly comment shares: Akron up, Kent State down
Akron positive ↑Kent State positive ↓Negative shareHover a W or L for that week’s result
AKR 35KENT 42
Akron had the happier comment section in 11 of 21 shared weeks, Kent State in 10. When they met on Nov 11, Kent State won 42–35 (OT); Kent State’s comments were the more positive that week.
Weekly positive and negative comment shares for Akron and Kent State
Week ofAkron resultAkron positive shareAkron negative shareKent State resultKent State positive shareKent State negative share
2025-08-23L23.6%62.3%40.5%11.9%
2025-08-3048.1%40.7%W67.9%11.3%
2025-09-06L32.2%54.8%L94.5%3.3%
2025-09-13L63.6%33.3%L63.3%13.3%
2025-09-20W79.5%8.9%L0%0%
2025-09-27L34.8%58%65.5%10.9%
2025-10-04W76.7%8.9%L35%50%
2025-10-11L66.7%33.3%W54.5%9.1%
2025-10-18L68.8%9.4%L66.7%0%
2025-10-25W82.9%6.1%W91.9%5%
2025-11-01W84.9%9.6%L71.4%11.4%
2025-11-08L53%34.9%W68.8%0%
2025-11-15W83.7%14%L55.2%13.8%
2025-11-22100%0%W81.3%0%
2025-11-2993.9%0%37.5%12.5%
2025-12-06100%0%85.7%0%
2025-12-13100%0%59.5%7.1%
2025-12-20100%0%90%0%
2025-12-2766.7%16.7%80%0%
2026-01-0366.7%16.7%
2026-01-1066.7%6.7%34.2%47.4%
2026-01-1766.7%11.1%61.5%38.5%
Reactions from that night · Nov 11
Akron

Will the game be on television????

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook

Here's the link for the streamed: https://combet.king-cpasports.com/football.php

neutralBroadcast & MediaFacebook
Kent State

Let's go https://www.facebook.com/share/15SDHBXB7xG/

positiveFacebook

Battle for the Wagon Wheel rivalry Central! #MACtion!

positiveFacebook

Fingerprint duel

Each fanbase's national percentile on the seven comment-topic groups, overlaid.

AkronKent State
Harm · Low volumeIdentity-Based Abuse · Low volumeExplicit Language · Low volumeCollege Sports · Low volumeOff-Field Storylines · Low volumeSports Betting · Low volumeTeam & Front Office · Low volume
Each axis is the team's percentile among ranked FBS teams for that tag group; deltas are gaps in percentile points. Low-volume fanbases are excluded from each cohort.
  • Akron Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Akron Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Harm: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Identity-Based Abuse: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Explicit Language: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State College Sports: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Off-Field Storylines: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Sports Betting: low volume, not ranked
  • Kent State Team & Front Office: low volume, not ranked

The season, felt twice

Weekly positive share for both comment sections on one axis; hover shows the week's combined comment volume. Akron's positive share was higher in 14 of 21 shared weeks, Kent State's in 7.

AKRKENT
0%50%100%Aug 23Jan 17
Weekly values: AKR, KENT
Week ofAKRKENTComments
2025-08-2323.6%40.5%148
2025-08-3048.1%67.9%80
2025-09-0632.2%94.5%206
2025-09-1363.6%63.3%63
2025-09-2079.5%0%113
2025-09-2734.8%65.5%124
2025-10-0476.7%35%110
2025-10-1166.7%54.5%38
2025-10-1868.8%66.7%50
2025-10-2582.9%91.9%242
2025-11-0184.9%71.4%108
2025-11-0853%68.8%99
2025-11-1583.7%55.2%115
2025-11-22100%81.3%18
2025-11-2993.9%37.5%49
2025-12-06100%85.7%12
2025-12-13100%59.5%44
2025-12-20100%90%14
2025-12-2766.7%80%11
2026-01-0366.7%0%18
2026-01-1066.7%34.2%53
2026-01-1766.7%61.5%31
Behind the numbers

Sence read 2,498,712 college-football comments to build this site. It can read yours.